The stabilisation of the Leaning Tower of Pisa was completed a long time ago. On June 16, 2001, the day of Saint Rainier (Pisa's Patron Saint), the citizens of Pisa were returned their monument. On December 31 of the same year the International Committee that had been established more than 10 years before with the task of studying and implementing measures to restore the tower to health, was disbanded. The Committee studies, the gradual and painstaking research and understanding of the tower's problems, the devising and definition of temporary and permanent stabilisation works and lastly their implementation have repeatedly been mentioned and dealt with in several scientific articles published in specialised journals. The executive planning and actual implementation of the works devised and planned by the Committee, though less known, but equally rich and interesting was carried out with passion, commitment and great skill by the Consorzio Progetto Torre di Pisa (Tower of Pisa Project Consortium) composed of the companies Trevi, Rodio, Italsonda, Ismes and Bonifica.
Because of two-fold risk (geotechnical risk of overturning and structural risk of failure due to brittle fracture) and also because of the worsening situation, the Committee adopted a two-stage strategy: immediately carrying out temporary stabilisation works, making sure these works were reversible, so as to buy some time and then carefully study, experiment and implement the final stabilisation works.
As with regards to the structural risk, temporary works consisted of circling some parts of the Tower with slightly pre-tensioned strands. Final, permanent works consisted of inserting stainless steel bars to connect the inner and outer surfaces, performing injections in the masonry works and wrapping the top of the first order and the bottom of the second order with harmonic stainless steel wires; these works affected very small areas of the Tower.
As with regards to the geotechnical risk, the temporary works consisted of applying a counterweight to the Tower, on the Northern side; the counterweight was made of a pile of lead ingots weighing about 1,000 tons.
the Committee decided to reduce the Tower inclination by about one half degree, inducing controlled subsidence beneath the Northern edge of the foundation. In addition to substantially improve the stability conditions of the foundation, these works should also be able to reduce the tensile stress in the Tower, thus reducing the necessary structural reinforcement; moreover, this work would also fully respect not just the formal integrity of the monument but also its material and historical integrity.